The Economy and the Environment, like two ends of a see-saw. While the world economy was soaring, the environment was plummetting. The question is, now that the world economy is tanking, will the environment get a respite from the pillage and plunder? I wish I knew. While people have stopped buying stuff which is good, they are losing their jobs which is not good. To have a good economy, do we have to plunder and destroy the earth and its creatures? Perhaps we need to change the definition of good economy. A good economy cannot be one that consumes itself. Maybe a good economy is where there is enough--enough creative work, enough nourishing food, enough clean air & water, and enough clean energy--and that if these are not present, the economy is not good.
A good step toward answering the question of what is enough is a step toward the mirror while answering the Quaker queries:
Do I look for and see the face of God in all creation?
Do I spend time in nature listening for what I might learn?
Have I mourned the loss of species and the harm done by pollution, and am I aware of my part in these losses?
Do I endeavor to change my personal as well as societal practices as an epression of hope for the future?
Thought for the day:
"Ye have no time but this present." George Fox